tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5232161716029893381.post3294395169089231880..comments2022-05-11T10:10:29.782-07:00Comments on Philosophy of Space Exploraton: Some Reservations about the Economic CaseRyan Munevarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01819338408967576382noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5232161716029893381.post-62928942752371827152010-04-08T21:33:47.679-07:002010-04-08T21:33:47.679-07:00Justin,
Thank you for your comment. It may well ...Justin,<br /><br />Thank you for your comment. It may well be in our nature to explore, as I pointed out in an earlier posting, but, as I also pointed out then, from a philosophical perspective, the question is one of justification, and the fact that something is in our nature cannot by itself serve as a justification. Imagine that rape were in men's nature. Surely that wouldn't justify rape.<br /><br />As for your very interesting suggestions about the Philadelphia experiment, Tesla's participation, and the whole thing being based on Einstein's Unified Field Theory and rotating magnetic fields, etc., I have to confess that I am far from being an expert on such matters. Nevertheless, from my limited knowledge (and so please take my reply with a grain of salt) it seems to me that it is very unlikely that a whole ship could have been made to look invisible back in 1943 (the Philadelphia experiment) for the following reasons. Einstein's Unified Field Theory was a colossal flop. He was in constant communication about his results with the best physicists of the day, many of whom were his friends, and when they checked his mathematical results, the thing just didn't work. Indeed, one of them said that Einstein had been abandoned by the Lord. He tried unsuccessfully to get this theory to work until his death. I don't believe he ever claimed success. Since then the judgment on his attempt has not been more charitable. The main problem: He tried to bypass quantum physics, which he didn't like.<br /><br />As for the idea that the whole ship could be made invisible, I don't want to say that it cannot be done if you could create extraordinarily large gravitational fields in a very small volume. But we do not have anything like that sort of technology today (if it can exist) and certainly we did not have it then.<br /><br />Concerning the rotating magnetic fields, there is some work based on general relativity (not the Unified Field Theory) that bears some resemblance to this reference. Indeed you can look up the work on Gravity B, an extraordinary space experiment on gravitational physics that is orbiting over our heads right now. This is the cutting edge of the field. The project director is Francis Everitt from Stanford. I will post a blog on this in a couple of months. At any rate, even this kind of work could not be done before the late 1970s, simply because the necessary precision of the instruments was not attainable until then (I will explain this in my future blog).<br /><br />I suspect that the Nazis did not do much to find antigravity either, in spite of rumors to that effect, simply because we can't do it today, even though some people would love to. And besides, it would be unlikely for the Nazis to embark on such a project because they hated Einstein and despised his physics (they called it "Jewish physics"). <br /><br />Anyway, thank you again for your comment. It seems that between your blog and mine our readers can find a good combination of imagination and skepticism.<br /><br />Best,<br /><br />GonzaloGonzalo Munevarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01949177947376556129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5232161716029893381.post-53729152575173514192010-04-07T18:43:24.383-07:002010-04-07T18:43:24.383-07:00Namaste Gonzalo, it will be my pleasure to follow ...Namaste Gonzalo, it will be my pleasure to follow your work. I find your background to be quite interesting. I look forward to reviewing your work on consciousness. <br />Regarding the above article. When considering the value of the space program I naturally recoil at the cost juxtaposed to using such funding for more humane aspirations. However, when considering how the space program facilites the network which enables such fine discourse, I pause. Of course space exploration offers much more added value when considering the expansion of knowledge. <br />In the end Gonzolo I feel this issue transcends mere fiscal considerations. We are a naturally curious species, one way or another we will continue to explore. <br /><br />I feel we only see a tip of the iceberg when discussing space travel. I am of the opinion the work started by Einstein on hyperdimentional travel has given much fruit. Tesla's work as part of the "Philadelphia Experiment " and " The Nazi Bell ", Secret Technology. Investigator of alternative technologies, Joseph P. Farrell discussed his research into secret military projects such as 'the Bell' made by the Third Reich, and the Philadelphia Experiment conducted in the United States. Both projects may have incorporated Einstein's Unified Field Theory, and made use of rotating magnetic fields and torsion physics, working with spirals of space itself, he explained. Such technology could be at use in a secret space program, that runs parallel to NASA. <br />Justified speculation is rife throughout the internet demanding disclosure os secret projects. If we consider torsion physics to have follow a conservative curve of development I am sure we would both agree hyperdimentional travel has likely been perfected for safe use.<br />I include a video link for your consideration, as well, I invite you to enjoy the advanced science video library section on my blog site. Hope to see you as a follower so you may offer an opportunity for dialogue on a more gnostic level. <br />12 Part Video on N.A.S.A. Secret Space Travel projects and Germany's The Bell Project:<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUu5FYtDHG8<br /><br />My blog site:<br />www.godlymanifestation.blogspot.com<br /><br />In Lak'ech, my brother Gonzalo, from a bicket of fear mankind finds love...christopherdossantos3@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16333197295906640548noreply@blogger.com